Compare phones
Motorola FIRE
XT311| Global Score | |
| 41 | 44.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 2.3 |
| -- | 2011-07-11 |
| 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches | 4.59 x 2.28 x 0.53 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 3.88 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive |
| 6.2 | 5.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm MSM7227-1 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 600 MHz processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 256 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 7.29 | 6.84 |
| Storage | |
| 143,36 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.7 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 3.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 5.61 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 1.1 | 3.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 550 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | 9.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola FIRE is slightly better than Nokia Asha 300, with a 44.7 score against 41. Motorola FIRE is a just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the Nokia Asha 300. Nokia Asha 300 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola FIRE, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 320 x 240 pixels resolution, the Nokia Asha 300 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Nokia Asha 300 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola FIRE, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Nokia Asha 300 captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola FIRE, and although they both have the same (VGA) video definition, the Nokia Asha 300 also has higher video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola FIRE counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia Asha 300. The Motorola FIRE has a much longer battery duration than Nokia Asha 300.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola FIRE is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.