Compare phones
HTC Ozone
XV6175| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 42.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| -- | Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 |
| 2012-02-27 | 2009-06-25 |
| 4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches | 4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches |
| 3.74 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow | -- |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 6 |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 192 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 7.29 | 6.66 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.92 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 4.73 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.6 | 2.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 707 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 324 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Nokia Asha 302 has an overall score of 43.5, which is just a bit better than HTC Ozone's 42.3 general score. Nokia Asha 302's construction is notably newer, but a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the HTC Ozone. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a slightly better looking screen than HTC Ozone. Both have the same number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a screen of the same size and an equal 240 x 320 resolution.
The Nokia Asha 302 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Ozone. Nokia Asha 302 has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC Ozone, although it has 64 MB lesser RAM memory, they both have 1 cpu cores. Nokia Asha 302 has a better camera than HTC Ozone, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The HTC Ozone counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a 1500mAh battery size instead of 1430mAh.
The Nokia Asha 302 costs exactly the same than HTC Ozone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.