Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-02-27 | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 7.29 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.92 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 707 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C has a general score of 64.8, which is way better than Nokia Asha 302's 43.5 overall score. Nokia 3.1 C's construction is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but also much heavier than the Nokia Asha 302. Nokia 3.1 C counts with a greater processing power than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a lot bigger display, a much higher resolution of 720 x 1440 and a way greater screen pixels density. The Nokia 3.1 C has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 3.1 C has a much longer battery performance than Nokia Asha 302, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia 3.1 C takes greater photographs and videos than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a lot higher video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Nokia 3.1 C costs the same than Nokia Asha 302, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.