Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | ZTE |
| -- | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2013-10-22 | 2017-07-14 |
| 4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | -- |
| 143 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 5.94 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | -- |
| 320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.72 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Blade Spark is a lot better than Nokia Asha 500, having a overall score of 57.4 against 38. The ZTE Blade Spark construction is way newer and somewhat thinner than the Nokia Asha 500's, but it is also notably heavier. The ZTE Blade Spark features a much better looking display than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a way bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 720 x 1280px and much more pixels per inch of display.
ZTE Blade Spark counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. The ZTE Blade Spark counts with a much powerful processor than Nokia Asha 500, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and more CPU cores.
ZTE Blade Spark captures a lot better photos and videos than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a back camera with a lot better 13 MP resolution and a way higher video quality. The ZTE Blade Spark counts with a superior battery life than Nokia Asha 500, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 1200mAh.
ZTE Blade Spark is a bit more expensive than the Nokia Asha 500, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.