Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.634.7
Basic Information
NokiaLG
2010-06-032010-10-27
4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches4.21 x 2.16 x 0.63 inches
2.78 ounces4.50 ounces
Blue, Gray and Red--
$ 330.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches--
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
114 pixels per inch133 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.7
processor processor
16 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.675.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
1.521
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
128 x 96 (10 fps) video resolution--
3.745.17
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
504 hours standby time
10.6 hours talk time
340 hours standby time
6.3 hours talk time
2.641.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The LG Octane has a score of 34.7, which is just a bit better than the Nokia C1-01's 31.6 overall score. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also way heavier and thicker. The LG Octane features a bit superior processing unit than Nokia C1-01. Both of them have 0 cpu cores.

LG Octane counts with just a bit better looking display than Nokia C1-01, because it has a lot better 240 x 320 resolution and a little bit greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. The LG Octane has a lot better camera than Nokia C1-01, because it has a camera with a much better 3.2 megapixels resolution.

The Nokia C1-01 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Octane, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 32 GB. Nokia C1-01 counts with a much longer battery life than LG Octane.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG Octane is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.