Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.634.5
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
2010-06-032006-07-25
4.25 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches
2.61 ounces4.05 ounces
Black, Blue and White--
$ 139.00$ 120.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches--
128 x 160 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch128 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.6
processor processor
16 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.675.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory20,48 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
1.520.3
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
128 x 96 (10 fps) video resolution--
3.744.73
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery780mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
396 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
2.642.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 1.2

Comparison review

Motorola ROKR Z3 is slightly better than Nokia C2-00, having a 34.5 score against 31.6. The Motorola ROKR Z3 is a much older, just a little thicker and way heavier phone than Nokia C2-00. The Motorola ROKR Z3 features a little better hardware performance than Nokia C2-00. They have a 0-Core processing unit.

Motorola ROKR Z3 features a bit better looking screen than Nokia C2-00, because it has a little bit higher display pixel density and a higher resolution of 220 x 176px. The Nokia C2-00 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola ROKR Z3, although it has only 10,24 MB internal storage.

Motorola ROKR Z3 features a very superior camera than Nokia C2-00, because it has a much higher 2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia C2-00 has improved battery duration than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a 31% more battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola ROKR Z3 is also cheaper than the Nokia C2-00, making it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.