Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.335.2
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2011-06-212011-03-09
4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches
4.06 ounces3.20 ounces
--Gray
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)128 x 160 pixels
LCDTFT
154 pixels per inch102 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
5.85.3
processor processor
32 MB RAM128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
1.520
Camera
2.00 MP0.30 MP
4.733.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
600 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
2.642.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

The Samsung Factor is a bit better than the Nokia C2-02, getting a global score of 35.2 against 33.3. Although the Samsung Factor and Nokia C2-02 were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Factor's body is a lot lighter but also a bit thicker. Samsung Factor's CPU is just as good as Nokia C2-02's processing unit, and although the Samsung Factor has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.

Nokia C2-02 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Factor, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a lot greater display density. The Nokia C2-02 has a very superior camera than Samsung Factor, because it has a way more MP camera. Nokia C2-02 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Factor, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 32 GB.

Nokia C2-02 features improved battery performance than Samsung Factor, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.

The Samsung Factor is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.