Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.435.9
Basic Information
NokiaLG
2011-06-212008-06-11
4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches4.10 x 2.20 x 0.50 inches
4.06 ounces3.76 ounces
$ 95.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
LCDTFT
154 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
ResistiveResistive
5.85.9
processor processor
32 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.520
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution
4.735.06
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM, Dual SIM--
0.30.2
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
360 hours standby time
4.7 hours talk time
2.642.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The LG Dare is just a bit better than Nokia C2-03, having a 35.9 score against 33.4. LG Dare's body is a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than Nokia C2-03, even though it was released 3 years before. LG Dare has a bit better display than Nokia C2-03, because it has a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 400 x 240 pixels.

Nokia C2-03 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Dare. The LG Dare's processing unit is very similar to Nokia C2-03's processor, both have a 0-Core processor. The LG Dare has a bit better camera than Nokia C2-03, because it has a camera with a way better 3.2 mega pixels resolution.

LG Dare features just a little better battery life than Nokia C2-03, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Dare is also cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.