Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.3 | 65.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-29 | 2016-11-11 |
| 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 4.64 ounces |
| Tempered blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 110.00 | $ 104.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 293 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8300 GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 4a is just a bit better than the Nokia C2 Tava, getting a 65.8 score against 63.3. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi 4a has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Nokia C2 Tava has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Redmi 4a is older than the Nokia C2 Tava, it's construction is way lighter and just a bit thinner.
Nokia C2 Tava features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4a. Both of them have a Quad-Core processing unit and 2 GB of RAM memory. The Nokia C2 Tava counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 720 x 1440.
Nokia C2 Tava counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB, the Nokia C2 Tava also has 32 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a bit superior battery lifetime than Nokia C2 Tava, because it has a 4 percent larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a much better camera than Nokia C2 Tava, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a also has a back camera with a way better 13 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi 4a is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.