Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is much better than Nokia C5 Endi's overall score of 66.2. Even though HTC One M9 is a lot older and just a bit thicker than the Nokia C5 Endi, it's design is still lighter. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Nokia C5 Endi has Android 10.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia C5 Endi, and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount, the HTC One M9 also has a GPU and a 64-bits CPU. HTC One M9 features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia C5 Endi, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
HTC One M9 takes way better videos and photos than Nokia C5 Endi, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition. The Nokia C5 Endi has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 128 GB, the Nokia C5 Endi also has 32 GB more internal storage.
The Nokia C5 Endi features a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The HTC One M9 costs a bit more than Nokia C5 Endi, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.