Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2010-03-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 3.15 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gray and White | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.4 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 1.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 630 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is way better than the Nokia C5, getting a score of 76.4 against 40.7. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system, while Nokia C5 has Symbian 9.3 operating system. Motorola DROID Turbo is a way newer and thinner phone than Nokia C5, although it is much heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better screen than Nokia C5, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a way larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia C5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 31,95 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much powerful processor than Nokia C5, because it has a graphics processor, a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster). Motorola DROID Turbo has a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia C5, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 1050mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo captures a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia C5, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.