Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2010-03-02 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.15 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 1.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 630 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is much better than Nokia C5, with a global score of 83.3 against 40.7. The Galaxy S9 body is newer and a lot thinner, but also much heavier than the Nokia C5. Galaxy S9 counts with a much more vibrant display than Nokia C5, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a really bigger screen and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 has a very superior memory for apps and games than Nokia C5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB and 63,95 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a very superior hardware performance than Nokia C5, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S9 counts with a superior battery performance than Nokia C5, because it has a 186% greater battery capacity. Galaxy S9 captures a lot better videos and photos than Nokia C5, because it has a much better resolution back camera and a much better video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also the cheapest, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.