Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian Symbian^3 | -- |
| 2010-09-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.62 x 2.24 x 0.41 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Brown and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 210 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 680 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (25 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 555 hours standby time 9.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is way better than Nokia C7, getting a 79.5 score against 49.8. The Galaxy S7 design is much newer and thinner than the Nokia C7's, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S7 has a much greater hardware performance than Nokia C7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores.
Galaxy S7 has a lot better looking display than Nokia C7, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a way bigger screen and a way higher display density. Samsung Galaxy S7 shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia C7, because it has a much better (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Galaxy S7 counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia C7, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 200 GB and more internal memory. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much longer battery life than Nokia C7, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S7 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.