Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2010-04-13 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.53 x 2.32 x 0.50 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 625 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is much better than the Nokia E5's general score of 44.4. Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 operating system, while Nokia E5 works with Symbian 9.3 operating system. Although the Google Pixel 3a XL is way heavier than Nokia E5, it's much thinner and way newer.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better hardware performance than Nokia E5, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much more vibrant display than Nokia E5, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px, way more pixels per inch in the display and a way bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 3a XL captures a lot better videos and photos than Nokia E5, because it has a lot better video definition, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and a lot higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera. Google Pixel 3a XL features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia E5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a much longer battery performance than Nokia E5, because it has a 208% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.