Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2009-05-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 61,44 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.5 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 672 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than Nokia E52, getting an 80.7 score against 41.4. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the Nokia E52's, but it's also much heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL has an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia E52, because it has a way bigger screen, a much greater display pixel density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior processing power than Nokia E52, because it has a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots greater pictures and videos than Nokia E52, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Google Pixel 3 XL has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia E52, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a really longer battery performance than Nokia E52, because it has a 129 percent more battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs a little more money than Nokia E52, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.