Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-05-06 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 61,44 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.5 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 672 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is much better than Nokia E52's 41.4 overall score. Although Google Pixel 3a is heavier than the Nokia E52, it's somewhat thinner and also way newer. The Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 operating system, and Nokia E52 works with Symbian 9.3 operating system.
Google Pixel 3a features an incredibly better display than Nokia E52, because it has a way better display pixels density, a way bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2220 resolution. Google Pixel 3a has a much better performing processor than Nokia E52, because it has a larger number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3a features much more memory to store more games and applications than Nokia E52, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3a shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia E52, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a way better battery performance than Nokia E52, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a is also the cheapest one, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.