Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.2 | 30.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| Symbian 9.1 | -- |
| 2005-10-12 | 2006-03-18 |
| 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches | 3.40 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 3.60 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 115.00 |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.4 | 3.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 76,8 MB internal memory | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson W710 is just a bit better than the Nokia E61, getting a global score of 30.8 against 28.2. The Sony Ericsson W710 construction is notably thicker but way lighter than Nokia E61, and they were released with only a couple months difference. Sony Ericsson W710 features a processor that's very similar to Nokia E61's processing unit, they have a 0-Core processing unit.
Nokia E61 features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Ericsson W710, because it has a better resolution of 240 x 320. The Nokia E61 has much more storage for games and applications than Sony Ericsson W710, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 66,56 MB more internal memory capacity.
Sony Ericsson W710 has a very superior camera than Nokia E61. The Nokia E61 counts with a really longer battery life than Sony Ericsson W710, because it has a 1500mAh battery size instead of 900mAh.
The Sony Ericsson W710 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.