Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian 9.1 | -- |
| 2006-09-12 | 2007-10-11 |
| 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 5.10 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.4 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 81,92 MB internal memory | -- |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.5 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is a bit better than Nokia E62, with a score of 28.6 against 26.2. Motorola W175 is a extremely lighter cellphone than the Nokia E62, but they have the same thickness. The Motorola W175 features a much sharper screen than Nokia E62, although it has a much lower resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
The Motorola W175's processor is very similar to Nokia E62's processor, both have 0 CPU cores. The Nokia E62 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola W175. The Nokia E62 features a superior battery life than Motorola W175, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 940mAh.
Motorola W175's camera is just as good as the camera in Nokia E62.
Motorola W175 costs a bit more than the Nokia E62, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.