Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.739.5
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
Symbian 9.1--
2005-10-122012-10-15
4.60 x 2.08 x 0.86 inches3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches
4.48 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
352 x 416 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.55.9
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset
ARM9 (Single-Core 220 MHz) processor Single-Core 480 MHz processor
64 MB RAM128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.856.57
Storage
76,8 MB internal memory--
miniSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.50
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
352 x 288 video resolution--
4.734.51
Networks
Wi-Fi--
UMTS, EDGE and GSM--
SIM--
2.80
Battery Life
1150mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
348 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.82.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Samsung M400 is much better than Nokia E70, getting a 39.5 score against 32.7. The Samsung M400 is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than Nokia E70. Samsung M400 counts with a better performing CPU than Nokia E70, and although they both have a Single-Core CPU, the Samsung M400 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.

Samsung M400 features a lot better display than Nokia E70, although it has a lot lower resolution of 320 x 240px. Nokia E70 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung M400. Nokia E70 features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung M400, because it has 1150mAh of battery capacity.

The Nokia E70 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung M400, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution.

Samsung M400 and the Nokia E70 cost exactly the same, making this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.