Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2009-06-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than Nokia E72, with a global score of 80.7 against 44.4. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is much heavier than the Nokia E72, it's way thinner and also extremely newer. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better performing CPU than Nokia E72, because it has 7 more cores and 3,88 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better screen than Nokia E72, because it has a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a lot bigger screen and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better camera than Nokia E72, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia E72, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better battery performance than Nokia E72, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.