Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-06-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a lot better than the Nokia E72, having a 78.8 score against 44.4. The Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 OS, and Nokia E72 counts with Symbian 9.3 OS. Even though the Google Pixel 3a is heavier than the Nokia E72, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much powerful CPU than Nokia E72, because it has 3,88 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3a features an incredibly better display than Nokia E72, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2220 resolution, way more pixels per display inch and a much larger display. The Google Pixel 3a captures much better photographs and videos than Nokia E72, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Google Pixel 3a has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia E72, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 63,75 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3a has a superior battery life than Nokia E72, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.