Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2009-06-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is way better than Nokia E72, getting an 83.8 score against 44.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is way heavier than the Nokia E72, it's extremely thinner and extremely newer. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much powerful CPU than Nokia E72, because it has more RAM and 7 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better looking display than Nokia E72, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a much larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way better camera than Nokia E72, because it has a much better 25 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments and a much higher 1920x1080 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia E72, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery performance than Nokia E72, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Nokia E72, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.