Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.40 x 1.97 x 0.57 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.72 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a lot better than Nokia E75 US, getting a 78.9 score against 38.5. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with Android 11 OS, while Nokia E75 US has Symbian 9.3 OS. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is heavier but much thinner than the Nokia E75 US. Google Pixel 3a XL features a lot better screen than Nokia E75 US, because it has a much greater display pixel density, a way larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia E75 US, although it has no slot for external memory cards. Google Pixel 3a XL features an extremely better processing unit than Nokia E75 US, because it has more cpu cores. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a greater camera than Nokia E75 US, because it has a much higher 12.2 MP resolution back camera and a way better (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a way better battery lifetime than Nokia E75 US, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 1000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Nokia E75 US.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.