Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 5.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2015-03-01 |
| 4.40 x 1.97 x 0.57 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 167 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 5.72 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is way better than Nokia E75 US, having a score of 77.7 against 38.5. The HTC One M9 is a incredibly thinner but heavier cellphone than the Nokia E75 US. HTC One M9 works with Android 5.0 operating system, and Nokia E75 US comes with Symbian 9.3 operating system. HTC One M9 has a very superior performance than Nokia E75 US, because it has more cpu cores, a graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
HTC One M9 features a way better display than Nokia E75 US, because it has a lot better 1920 x 1080 resolution, a way better pixel amount per inch of display and a lot bigger screen. HTC One M9 captures much clearer videos and photos than Nokia E75 US, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The HTC One M9 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Nokia E75 US. HTC One M9 has a superior battery lifetime than Nokia E75 US, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity against 1000mAh.
HTC One M9 costs a little more than Nokia E75 US, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.