Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 39.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2009-02-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 4.40 x 1.97 x 0.57 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 360.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is way better than the Nokia E75's 39.3 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is just a little bit heavier than Nokia E75, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. The Google Pixel 4a counts with Android 11 OS, and Nokia E75 comes with Symbian 9.3 OS.
The Google Pixel 4a has an incredibly better screen than Nokia E75, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a lot larger screen and a way greater number of pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia E75, although it has no external memory slot.
Google Pixel 4a has an extremely better processor than Nokia E75, because it has a higher number of faster cores. Google Pixel 4a takes much better videos and photos than Nokia E75, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality, a much larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia E75, because it has a 214% more battery size.
Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia E75, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.