Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Nokia G400, having a general score of 81.3 against 75.5. The LG V35 ThinQ is an incredibly older phone than the Nokia G400, but LG was able to build it thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Nokia G400, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia G400, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia G400, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia G400 has a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. Nokia G400 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia G400 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.