Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Nokia G400, with a score of 83.8 against 75.5. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an much older cellphone than Nokia G400, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that's very similar to Nokia G400's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little better performance than Nokia G400. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia G400 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia G400 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Nokia G400 features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.