Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a lot better than Nokia G400's 75.5 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is older than Nokia G400, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Galaxy A52 features just a little better performance than Nokia G400, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Nokia G400 and the Galaxy A52 have quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A52 captures better photos and videos than Nokia G400, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia G400, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia G400 features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.