Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-08-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Nokia G400, having a 91.3 score against 75.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is older than Nokia G400, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 12 operating system. The Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G feature similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of display.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little better processing power than Nokia G400, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures better photographs and videos than Nokia G400, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much better (4K) video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Nokia G400 has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.