Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-08-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Nokia G400, getting a global score of 91.1 against 75.5. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Nokia G400 has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A52s is older than the Nokia G400, it's construction is a bit lighter and a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a display that is just as good as the Nokia G400 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels amount per inch in the display. Galaxy A52s features a little better processing power than Nokia G400, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia G400, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Nokia G400 has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A52s takes better photographs and videos than Nokia G400, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a way higher (4K) video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.