Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the Nokia G400, having a overall score of 79.5 against 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an notably older cellphone than the Nokia G400, but it is much lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Nokia G400 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Nokia G400 also has a greater number of 2.2 GHz cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a sharper display than Nokia G400, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density. Nokia G400 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia G400 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy S7 counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Nokia G400, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. Nokia G400 has a way better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.