Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Nokia G400's 75.5 global score. These devices include the same Android 12 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Nokia G400, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better screen than Nokia G400, because it has a just a bit better display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than Nokia G400, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia G400 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Nokia G400 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia G400 also has a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.