Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Nokia G400's overall score of 75.5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Nokia G400 has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is a lot thinner than the Nokia G400, although it is a lot heavier and was released many years before.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Nokia G400 both count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processing unit than Nokia G400, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nokia G400 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Nokia G400 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Nokia G400 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.