Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-08-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.56 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Nokia G400, having a overall score of 90.6 against 75.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is an older and much heavier phone than Nokia G400, but Samsung could make it a lot thinner anyway. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while Nokia G400 has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than Nokia G400, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nokia G400 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2408, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia G400 features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia G400 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.