Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Nokia G50, getting a overall score of 80 against 74.5. The Google Pixel 3 is a extremely lighter and thinner device than the Nokia G50. Google Pixel 3 has a better display than Nokia G50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a much greater screen pixels density.
Nokia G50 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia G50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia G50. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Nokia G50 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Nokia G50 also has a way more megapixels back camera. The Nokia G50 counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.