Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the Nokia G50's 74.5 score. Both devices in this review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user all the same operating system features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Nokia G50.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better screen than Nokia G50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Nokia G50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Nokia G50 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia G50 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Nokia G50 also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
Nokia G50 features better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.