Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 253 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is just a bit better than the Nokia G50, getting a 77.6 score against 74.5. The HTC U11 body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia G50. HTC U11 has an incredibly better screen than Nokia G50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way better quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Nokia G50 counts with more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Nokia G50 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The HTC U11 has a bit faster processor than Nokia G50. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Nokia G50 counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia G50 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
The Nokia G50 has a way better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.