Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Nokia G50's 74.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the Nokia G50. The Galaxy A52 has just a little better performance than Nokia G50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia G50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better amount of pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia G50, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Nokia G50 features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Nokia G50, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.