Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Nokia G50, having a overall score of 88.5 against 74.5. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Nokia G50 has Android 11 version. Galaxy Z Flip's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Nokia G50. The Galaxy Z Flip has a better looking display than Nokia G50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2636px resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better hardware performance than Nokia G50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features more memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia G50, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Nokia G50 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Nokia G50 also counts with a camera with way more MP. Nokia G50 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.