Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | -- |
| 2013-07-11 | 2016-05-04 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 315.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 332 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC 10 is better than the Nokia Lumia 1020, with a 75.7 score against 68.7. HTC 10's design is incredibly newer and thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Nokia Lumia 1020. Lumia 1020 has a little sharper screen than HTC 10, although it has a much lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, a quite smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 768.
HTC 10 features much more storage to store more games and applications than Nokia Lumia 1020, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC 10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC 10 has a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia Lumia 1020, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The HTC 10 features a much longer battery life than Nokia Lumia 1020, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Lumia 1020 counts with a bit better camera than HTC 10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Lumia 1020 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
HTC 10 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.