Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 5.1 |
| 2013-07-11 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 315.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a bit better than Lumia 1020, having a overall score of 74.8 against 68.7. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a little bit heavier than Lumia 1020, it's somewhat thinner and also notably newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 comes with Android 5.1 OS, and Lumia 1020 counts with Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit better looking display than Lumia 1020, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440, a much greater display pixel density and a bigger display. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Lumia 1020, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Lumia 1020 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a higher number of cores. Lumia 1020 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Lumia 1020 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better battery duration than Lumia 1020, because it has an 88 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.