Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | -- |
| 2013-07-11 | 2017-08-01 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and White |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 315.00 | $ 144.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 332 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G5S Plus has a score of 74.8, which is a bit better than Nokia Lumia 1020's global score of 68.7. The Moto G5S Plus construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than the Nokia Lumia 1020's, although it's a bit heavier. The Moto G5S Plus counts with just a bit better processing power than Nokia Lumia 1020, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Nokia Lumia 1020 has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, although it has a quite worse number of pixels per screen inch, a way worse 1280 x 768 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen. The Lumia 1020 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Lumia 1020 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Moto G5S Plus counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Lumia 1020, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 128 GB. Moto G5S Plus has a much better battery duration than Lumia 1020, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.