Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-07-11 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 315.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 332 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G7 has a general score of 75.2, which is slightly better than Lumia 1020's 68.7 score. The Motorola Moto G7 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS, and Lumia 1020 works with Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS. Motorola Moto G7's body is much newer and thinner than Lumia 1020's, although it's also just a little bit heavier.
The Moto G7 features just a bit better hardware performance than Lumia 1020, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The Lumia 1020 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7, although it has a way lower resolution of 1280 x 768 pixels, a quite inferior pixel count in each screen inch and a much smaller screen.
The Lumia 1020 shoots better photographs and videos than Moto G7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Lumia 1020 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto G7 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lumia 1020, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G7 has a really longer battery life than Lumia 1020, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Moto G7 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.