Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | -- |
| 2013-07-11 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 315.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 332 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is better than the Lumia 1020, with a general score of 78.5 against 68.7. The Motorola One Action construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Lumia 1020. The Lumia 1020 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a way smaller screen, a just a little lower number of pixels per screen inch and a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 768 pixels.
The Motorola One Action features a superior storage for games and applications than Nokia Lumia 1020, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Motorola One Action has a bit faster processing unit than Lumia 1020, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM.
Motorola One Action features a really longer battery performance than Lumia 1020, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh. Nokia Lumia 1020 captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Nokia Lumia 1020 also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One Action is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Lumia 1020.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.