Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 10 |
| 2013-07-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.25 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange, White and Yellow | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 23.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than Nokia Lumia 625, with an 81.2 score against 57.7. The LG V40 ThinQ body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than Nokia Lumia 625's, although it is also a little bit heavier. LG V40 ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS, while Nokia Lumia 625 has Windows Phone 8 OS. LG V40 ThinQ has a better performance than Lumia 625, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cores and more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Lumia 625, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a way bigger display and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots greater videos and photos than Lumia 625, because it has a way better 12 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot larger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations, a lot better (4K) video definition and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
LG V40 ThinQ has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia Lumia 625, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 56 GB more internal memory. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better battery performance than Lumia 625, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.