Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 63.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 4.1, 4.0 |
| 2013-07-23 | 2012-07-10 |
| 5.25 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 5.26 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange, White and Yellow | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Kevlar |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 199 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 23.9 hours talk time | 204 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola ATRIX HD is slightly better than the Lumia 625, having a 63.5 score against 57.7. Although Motorola ATRIX HD is older than Lumia 625, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. The Motorola ATRIX HD counts with Android 4.1 operating system, and Lumia 625 comes with Windows Phone 8 operating system.
The Motorola ATRIX HD features just a little better performance than Nokia Lumia 625, because although it has a weaker graphics processor running at 400 MHz, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola ATRIX HD also counts with a greater amount of RAM. Motorola ATRIX HD counts with a little bit better display than Lumia 625, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels quantity per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1280 x 720.
Lumia 625 features a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola ATRIX HD, and although they both have equal 8 GB internal storage, the Lumia 625 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 64 GB. The Lumia 625 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a 12% more battery size.
Lumia 625 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola ATRIX HD, although it has a way worse resolution camera and a lower 1920x1080 video quality.
Motorola ATRIX HD not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.