Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-07-23 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.25 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 23.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is much better than Nokia Lumia 625's overall score of 57.7. Moto Z2 Play is a noticeably newer device, and it's also much thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Nokia Lumia 625. The Moto Z2 Play features a quite better performance than Nokia Lumia 625, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 3,5 GB more RAM.
Moto Z2 Play has a bit better display than Nokia Lumia 625, because it has a much greater screen density, a bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 625, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z2 Play shoots much better photos and videos than Nokia Lumia 625, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a much higher resolution back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Moto Z2 Play has a superior battery lifetime than Nokia Lumia 625, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Moto Z2 Play not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.