Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-07-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.25 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 23.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Nokia Lumia 625's 57.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Nokia Lumia 625. The Galaxy A50 has a better processor than Lumia 625, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid screen than Lumia 625, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a much better pixel density and a really bigger screen. The Galaxy A50 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Lumia 625, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery life than Lumia 625, because it has a 100% greater battery size. Galaxy A50 has a way better camera than Nokia Lumia 625, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a much higher resolution camera, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.