Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-02-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.04 x 2.66 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 6.70 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.29 inches (1/3.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 504 hours standby time 23.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Lumia 720, getting a general score of 81.3 against 55.9. Although LG V35 ThinQ is heavier than Lumia 720, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than Lumia 720, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5,5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
LG V35 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Nokia Lumia 720, because it has a lot larger screen, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and much more pixels per display inch. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 720, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Lumia 720, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than Lumia 720, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than Lumia 720, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.