Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2017-06-29 |
| 4.87 x 2.70 x 0.39 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 360 hours standby time 15.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is a lot better than Lumia 820, having a general score of 77.4 against 59.8. The Moto Z2 Play is a extremely newer device, and it is also a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner than the Lumia 820. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit better display than Lumia 820, because it has a lot better 1080 x 1920 resolution, a bigger screen and a way higher pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a little better processing power than Lumia 820, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. Moto Z2 Play has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Lumia 820, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z2 Play has a better camera than Lumia 820, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments and a camera with much more mega-pixels. The Moto Z2 Play has a much longer battery life than Lumia 820, because it has an 82% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Moto Z2 Play is also cheaper than the Nokia Lumia 820.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.